Skip to main content

Stories are more key than doctrine

Jacob Neusner, a Jew who describes himself as "speaking pretty good Catholic", argued that it was unproductive trying to translate between the doctrines of two faiths, but more promising to map the stories of one faith onto those of another. He said that if he were trying to explain to Jews how Catholics viewed Mary, he would appeal to an apocryphal story about Rachel. 


When the Jews were in exile in Babylon, all the male prophets appealed to God to bring them home and, being jealous of their past attachments to other gods, he would not listen. Rachel reminds him of a still more apocryphal story about her having allowed Jacob to partner with Leah first, and says, "If I could get over my jealousy you can get over yours." God relents. Rachel is the woman God will listen to when he will listen to no-one else; so is Mary.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Purgatory Revised

There was recently a Radio 4 In Our Time on Purgatory-- or maybe I only found it recently. It told me a lot I did not previously know, for example that virtually everyone went to Purgatory and  got out of it to Heaven eventually, but that the being there was appallingly painful, that was why it was worth taking steps to try to get people out earlier. --My own hunch, such as it is, is that we do get a thorough cleaning-up after death, and I know what some of that might be like. With the mother of two of my son's children I was on one occasion absolutely required to be supportive though it was the last thing I felt like doing. That process of being coerced by circumstances into doing a generous act which does not come at all naturally could easily be part of a cleaning-up. But Purgatory has to be about turning one into the best imaginable version of one's given self. Some of that must be unwelcome and uncomfortable, but some of it could be comforting. Suppose one's grudgin...

Jesus is not returning Just Yet.

I have been reading AN Wilson's Paul , not to mention Diarmaid McCulloch's History of Christianity.  The very early Christians (and I believe the very early Quakers) thought they were not going to have to keep it up for very long, Jesus was coming back in their lifetimes.  Prudence, self-sufficiency and fighting your family's corner were not called for. Jesus specifically said the disciples were not to worry about food or money in travelling in the ministry. Paul, by contrast, says "If a person does not work s/he will not eat". Ananias and Sapphira, in keeping back some money for their own use, were ahead of the game, and paid for it with their lives. (Or possibly they were punished only for not telling the truth.) --There has to have been a slow and unhappy acceptance that Christians were going to have to Keep it Up for a Long Time; and idealism will have got eroded. We need to inhabit that transition, and push the boundaries back in the direction of risk taki...

Peter's keys

These are the Keys Jesus supposedly awarded to St Peter, the keys of the Kingdom. He gave them to him before Peter promised to stick with him no matter what, and then disowned him three times, but not before Peter had developed the habit of opening his mouth and putting his foot in it. So if this story has some truth to it Jesus selected as Judge a man who would always have to have allowances made for him. (Interestingly, Peter does pass Paul's requirement that an Overseer/ episcopos should be a married man.) I have an amusing but moving image of a sort of Board Meeting in Heaven at which the participants are Jesus, St Peter, and God. They are discussing how humankind are coming along. The impatient one is Jesus who made, allegedly, the biggest and most painful effort to put humankind right. He says "They should be doing better than this by now". Peter, as is his wont, says "But you have to make allowances". And God says "But the suffering, the...